VOLTAGE TRANSMISSION
|
Source Impedance |
2 |
40 |
60 |
150 |
600 |
150 |
600 ohms |
Load Impedance |
200K |
200K |
200K |
200K |
200K |
150 |
600 ohms |
20Hz |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
-0.8 |
-0.3 |
200HZ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
-0.8 |
-0.2 |
2kHz |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
-0.4 |
-0.8 |
-0.4 |
20kHz |
+0.4 |
+0.2 |
0 |
-1.2 |
-8.5 |
-1.1 |
-4.2 |
45kHz (approx. peak) |
+2.0 |
+1.1 |
The reduction of the load impedance to 10K ohms did not noticeably effect these results.
In researching this paper, it was discovered that 60 ohms source impedance is the most desirable for several reasons.
1. High frequency resonances are adequately damped.
2. Frequency-amplitude response is flat and relatively independent of cable length, up to 450 meters, as shown in the following table:
EFFECT OF CABLE LENGTH ON FREQUENCY-AMPLITUDE RESPONSE
Source Impedance: 60 ohms
Load Impedance: 200K ohms
Length (meters) |
20kHz response |
High frequency Roll Off |
150 | 0 | -1dB @ 100kHz |
300 | 0 | -3dB @ 110kHz |
450 | -0.1dB | -3dB @ 70kHz |
600 | -0.4dB | -3dB @ 60kHz |
3. This source impedance is as high as practical for maintaining good amplitude stability independent of load.
EFFECT OF VARYING LOAD ON A 60 OHM SOURCE IMPEDANCE CIRCUIT
Load | Level drop |
20k ohm | -0.03dB |
5k ohm | -0.1dB |
600 ohm | -0.8dB |
The last case, of course, is not a normal operating condition but is a very probable error during the initial introduction of this type of a system.
This impedance provides good output isolation between separate outputs of the same amplifier, to protect from the danger of crosstalk which occurs when on output is connected to a signal source. There is no reason why the split node output impedance can not be 0.1 ohm or less, and the 60 ohm line driving impedance can be supplied by resistive splits (or build outs) (see figure 1B).
In this case, a similar 60 ohm signal from another source would be attenuated 61dB at the split node.
To sum up this section, for many reasons, a 60 ohm source impedance and a 20K ohm or greater input impedance is an ideal combination for audio transmission and distribution. This is a true voltage system in the sense that the load does not match the source nor terminate the line in its characteristic impedance. Modern circuit designs, with their inherently lower output impedance facilitate the adoption of this system.
Most broadcast facilities to date have been designed around power matched distribution systems. The usual Reference Level is +8dB, most often at 600 ohms, but in large facilities, 150 ohms is found. The Standard Output Level is +18dBm, and the Clip Level is +24dBm. Since these are power matched systems, there is a 6dB loss in the output pad (split), and therefore the output amplifier must be capable of delivering at least +30dBm (1 watt) and supplying almost 25Vrms open circuit in the case of the 600 ohm system. [Most major facilities today are +4dBu, unless there is a significant legacy system of +8]
Recording facilities have standardized on a Reference Level of +4dBm, 600 ohms, with a Standard Output Level of +14dBm and a Clip supplying 16Vrms open circuit.
The proposed voltage system would have a reference level of +8dBu, a Standard Output Level of +16dBu and a Clip level of +22dBu. Since there is no voltage drop in the buildout resistors, only a 10Vrms output capability is required.
In order to keep the relative program audio levels between PPM and VU facilities as close as possible, it was found independently by both the CBC and ABC that an 8dB difference between Reference Level and Standard Output Level was the best compromise.
An advantage of the PPM that is not immediately apparent is that in implementing it, it has an electronic input of 40k ohms, rather than a 3.9k ohm resistance isolating the VU meter rectifiers from the audio line. The non-linearities introduced by these diodes show as an increase in harmonic distortion.
Operator acceptance of the PPM at ABC has been better than anticipated. With our scale, program level is still run to "0" and the Reference Level setting is identified by the extended line at the "-8" marking, center scale. [6]
There are two schools of thought on how to connect voltage distribution systems, as shown below:
Scheme A is simple to wire, but a short any place on the line will disrupt all feeds, and the isolation against a backfeed from the jack is only about -26dB.
Scheme B, although requiring more wiring, is preferred by this writer from an overall system reliability standpoint. As mentioned before, the isolation against a backfeed in this system is about -60dB. A short on the output will drop the level by about 0.2dB.
In the case of an amplifier equipped with multiple splits, at least 33% of these splits should be permitted to be shorted without adversely affecting the amplifier performance.
Ideal interface specifications follow for an amplifier to be used in this proposed voltage system. Performance specifications should be state of the art, but that goes without saying.
INPUT IMPEDANCE 50k ohm, resistive, balanced and
floating (either side may be grounded
without affecting performance)
COMMON MODE REJECTION Greater than 80dB, 20 Hz to 1kHz,
Greater than 60dB to 20kHz.
INPUT CLIP LEVEL Greater than +30dBu (+36dBu at the
-12 gain setting)
INPUT COMMON MODE CAPABILITY + 10v peak to peak
SPLIT NODE OUTPUT IMPEDANCE Less than 0.1 ohm
OUTPUT IMPEDANCE 60 ohms, active balanced, each output
resistively built out.
OUTPUT CLIP LEVEL +24dBu, +22dBu with 15 ohms on the
split node.
OUTPUT BALANCE Less than +0.1dB difference, ref. to
ground.
OUTPUT DC Less than +/- 50mV
NUMBER OF OUTPUTS 12 in the amplifier plus split node.
GAIN RANGE ADJUSTMENT Front panel screwdriver adjust: -12, -6,0,
+12, +18, +24, +30, +/- 0.1dB.
VERNIER ATTENUATOR Front panel screwdriver select: DISABLED
ENABLE 0 to -6, 0 to infinity.
VERNIER ATTENUATOR Front panel screwdriver adjust.
FRONT PANEL INDICATORS Power, audio present, clip.
POWER Self powered from mains.
PACKAGING Plug in module
It was desired to use voltage type audio transmission in the new television facility for WABC-TV at 7 Lincoln Square. Within the facility, this philosophy has been maintained. This facility, however, needed to interface with the existing network facility, 450 meters away, which is a 150 ohm +8dBm power matched system. We decided that this level and impedance would be ideal for the long run between facilities. Two alternatives were considered for the interface between the two systems. The most obvious choice was to provide a separate amplifier in the WABC-TV facility for each line. This, due to the number of lines involved (in excess of 100) became costly, and introduced a decrease in overall system reliability.
An alternative passive interface system was considered preferable and was designed as shown below:
The WABC-TV output circuits were designed with buildout resistors providing a 150 ohm source impedance. In order to send a signal to the network facility, the +8dBu signal is simply patched into the 150 ohm150-ohm circuit. The 150 ohm load causes a 6dB drop in level to +2dBu, which is the voltage equivalent of +8dBm at 150 ohms. The only caveat that remains is that if an output split is used to feed a signal to a 150 ohm circuit, its level will, of course, be 6dB too low to "mult" to any other voltage system input.
The receive circuits were handled by using a 150 to 600 ohm step up transformer with its secondary terminated in 600 ohms. The voltage inputs then see a +8dBu source, but the source impedance was higher than desirable. the solution to that problem was to keep these source runs short and all within one room.
This writer is looking forward to refining the voltage transmission concept in future projects. It is a system which offers greater reliability from an electrical standpoint due to the lower power levels involved and from an operations stand point due to the fact it is almost fool proof. It is a fact of life that audio signals will be "multed". Let us at least provide a system that permits, without performance degradation, this "multing".." It seems that we have nothing to lose and everything to gain if we make the switch.
1. EIA STANDARD 219, "Audio Facilities for Radio Broadcasting Systems",," New York, Electronic Industries Association, 1959.
2. Schmid, Hans, "Audio, The Stepchild of Television Broadcasting", J. SMPTE, Volume 85, page 6-9 (1976 Jan.).
3. Schmid, Hans, "Audio Program Level, The VU Meter, and The Peak Program Meter", IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, Volume BC-23, No. 1, page 22-26 (1977 Mar.).
4. Jay, Frank (ed.), IEEE Standard Dictionary of Electrical and Electronic Terms, Second Edition, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., New York, 1977, page 771.
5. NAB STANDARD: "Cartridge Tape Recording and Reproducing", National Association of Broadcasters, Washington, 1976, pages 9-10.
6. Schmid, Hans, "Audio Program Level, The VU Meter, and the Peak Program Meter", op cit.
©1997-2000 Richard L. Hess All Rights Reserved