<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Restoration Tips &#038; Notes &#187; Sony APR-5000</title>
	<atom:link href="http://richardhess.com/notes/category/audio/reels/apr-5000/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://richardhess.com/notes</link>
	<description>Working with audio media (mostly tape) restoration</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 00:53:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Dangers of old tape recorders for playback; using the elevator head</title>
		<link>http://richardhess.com/notes/2009/09/02/dangers-of-old-tape-recorders-for-playback-using-the-elevator-head/</link>
		<comments>http://richardhess.com/notes/2009/09/02/dangers-of-old-tape-recorders-for-playback-using-the-elevator-head/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 20:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard L. Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sony APR-5000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[project notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage-care-handling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardhess.com/notes/?p=184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We are currently working on some un-published tapes for a major Canadian folk artist. We have a 7.5 in/s 2-track stereo recording that was one of (if not the) first studio recording of this artist from circa 1972.
At some point, this tape was played on a 1/4-track machine that injected hum onto the left channel. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are currently working on some un-published tapes for a major Canadian folk artist. We have a 7.5 in/s 2-track stereo recording that was one of (if not the) first studio recording of this artist from circa 1972.</p>
<p>At some point, this tape was played on a 1/4-track machine that injected hum onto the left channel. Here&#8217;s what the magnetic viewer showed:</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-185" title="hum_overwrite_dsc_0571" src="http://richardhess.com/notes/wp-content/uploads/hum_overwrite_dsc_0571.jpg" alt="hum_overwrite_dsc_0571" width="540" height="364" /></p>
<p><span id="more-184"></span>At the very top we can see a remnant of the left channel material, then the 120-Hz bars (62.5 mil spacing), then the remainder of the left channel material. In the middle is the guard band and at the bottom, the right channel.</p>
<p>Using a specially manufactured (by <a title="JRF Magnetics" href="http://www.jrfmagnetics.com" target="_blank">JRF Magnetics</a>) assembly that contains a 4-channel 8-track head with a continuously variable height adjustment, we were able to lower the track one head to the middle of the good portion of the left channel. With that height positioning, track five&#8217;s head was well into the right channel, so we got a good transfer without the hum.</p>
<p>We believe this hum was written by the record head due to a malfunction in the recorder rather than an intentional erasure. If there had been an erasure, more of the left channel would have been erased and there would be a guard band between hum bars and the left channel audio as almost all erase heads were wider than the audio heads.</p>
<p>This type of damage is all too common using old consumer tape machines for playing tapes. I had an old junker machine in the 1960s that did this once to a tape. Unfortunately, it was also a quarter-track recording, so it was gone.</p>
<p>The magnetic record is fragile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://richardhess.com/notes/2009/09/02/dangers-of-old-tape-recorders-for-playback-using-the-elevator-head/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sony APR-5000 head assembly problem</title>
		<link>http://richardhess.com/notes/2009/07/14/sony-apr-5000-head-assembly-problem/</link>
		<comments>http://richardhess.com/notes/2009/07/14/sony-apr-5000-head-assembly-problem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 21:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard L. Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sony APR-5000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardhess.com/notes/?p=167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was having slightly intermittent connections on one head assembly on a Sony APR-5000 and was concerned as to the cause because the 78-pin head connectors are essentially unobtanium and a headache to change.
As I installed and de-installed the head, I got to thinking that the connector might not be positioned correctly (i.e. perhaps the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was having slightly intermittent connections on one head assembly on a Sony APR-5000 and was concerned as to the cause because the 78-pin head connectors are essentially unobtanium and a headache to change.</p>
<p>As I installed and de-installed the head, I got to thinking that the connector might not be positioned correctly (i.e. perhaps the wrong hardware had somehow found its way into the connector mounting system.</p>
<p>When I measured the bottom (oriented as if the head were mounted in the machine) face of the connector mounting flange referenced to the bottom of the mounting posts (using a straight-edge across two of them), I discovered that, indeed, this connector was recessed about 25 mils (0.025&#8243;) further into the head assembly than several other ones. Adding a 25-mil thick washer should solve the problem.</p>
<p>This is posted in case you&#8217;re scratching your head with a similar problem. This is something I wouldn&#8217;t have immediately thought of. I don&#8217;t know if this was caused by aftermarket work or if it perhaps represents a manufacturing error.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://richardhess.com/notes/2009/07/14/sony-apr-5000-head-assembly-problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to play 4-track 1.875 in/s tapes&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://richardhess.com/notes/2007/11/21/how-to-play-4-track-1875-ins-tapes/</link>
		<comments>http://richardhess.com/notes/2007/11/21/how-to-play-4-track-1875-ins-tapes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 16:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard L. Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Racal Store 4DS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony APR-5000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[archival practices]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardhess.com/notes/2007/11/21/how-to-play-4-track-1875-ins-tapes/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I received a query from a gentleman in Europe about 1.875 in/s 4-track tapes. He was frustrated in finding a good machine for transferring them. Apparently, they have many of these tapes. Here are my suggestions.
Perhaps the easiest answer is to find a Studer-Revox C274 with low speed options. They were made.
Two other options.Â 
(1) the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I received a query from a gentleman in Europe about 1.875 in/s 4-track tapes. He was frustrated in finding a good machine for transferring them. Apparently, they have many of these tapes. Here are my suggestions.</p>
<p>Perhaps the easiest answer is to find a Studer-Revox C274 with low speed options. They were made.</p>
<p>Two other options.<span id="more-106"></span>Â </p>
<p>(1) the Sony APR-5000 will go to 1.88 in/s by using its -50% varispeed. Most of the ones I&#8217;ve had do an adequate job at that speed, but I&#8217;ve been cautioned by the ex-Sony guys on my Sony APR mailing list that this is way outside of design spec. I use Nortronics in-line 4-track heads, but I&#8217;m also in the middle of building a staggered 1/3, 2/4 head assembly since that will improve inter-program crosstalk. None of these heads do really well due to gap length considerations. I suspect (I haven&#8217;t done the math) that you want a 50 micro-inch or shorter gap to do this well.</p>
<p>(2) The Racal Store 4DS instrumentation recorder which has constant-flux playback equalization (needs to be filtered in the computer afterward) and is not fantastic for S/N ratio actually goes to 15/16 in/s and is a 4-track machine. The previous two entries here feature this interesting machine. I did invest in three of them (the one in the pictures is the prettiest) as well as a 1/2-inch 7-track 7DS.</p>
<p>Someday, I might get a C274 logger&#8230;but I prefer adapting versatile transports to specific applications rather than collecting dedicated-per-format machines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://richardhess.com/notes/2007/11/21/how-to-play-4-track-1875-ins-tapes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sony APR-5000 Hum Shields not working</title>
		<link>http://richardhess.com/notes/2006/03/13/sony-apr-5000-hum-shields-not-working/</link>
		<comments>http://richardhess.com/notes/2006/03/13/sony-apr-5000-hum-shields-not-working/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 22:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard L. Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sony APR-5000]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardhess.com/notes/2006/03/13/sony-apr-5000-hum-shields-not-working/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I got a call today from a friend who said the hum shields on a friend&#8217;s APR-5003 were not working.
I recalled this had happened to one of my machines in the past.
Removing the cover surrounding the heads will expose the mechanism&#8212;of course the heads and pinch roller need to come off first.
Cleaning and lubricating the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got a call today from a friend who said the hum shields on a friend&#8217;s APR-5003 were not working.</p>
<p>I recalled this had happened to one of my machines in the past.</p>
<p>Removing the cover surrounding the heads will expose the mechanism&#8212;of course the heads and pinch roller need to come off first.</p>
<p>Cleaning and lubricating the rods and other parts of the linkage should make all well again.</p>
<p>I used Zoom Spout Turbine Oil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://richardhess.com/notes/2006/03/13/sony-apr-5000-hum-shields-not-working/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sony APR speed experiments</title>
		<link>http://richardhess.com/notes/2006/03/06/sony-apr-speed-experiments/</link>
		<comments>http://richardhess.com/notes/2006/03/06/sony-apr-speed-experiments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 02:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard L. Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sony APR-16/24]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony APR-5000]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardhess.com/notes/2006/03/06/sony-apr-speed-experiments/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have been wondering just how far we can push the Sony APR-5000 capstan servo system, so we ran a few tests using an external oscillator feeding the reference port. Unlike Ampex, Otari, and Studer machines which use an external reference of 9,600 Hz; the Sony machines use an external reference of 19,200 Hz.
We found [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have been wondering just how far we can push the Sony APR-5000 capstan servo system, so we ran a few tests using an external oscillator feeding the reference port. Unlike Ampex, Otari, and Studer machines which use an external reference of 9,600 Hz; the Sony machines use an external reference of 19,200 Hz.</p>
<p>We found that the APR-5000s did not run reliably below 1.88 in/s &#8212; and that is achievable with a -50% varispeed already. It didn&#8217;t matter what the base speed was.</p>
<p>The APR-16 (cousin of the APR-24) did not run reliably below 3.75 in/s. But the good news was that we could bring 15 in/s down to 3.75 in/s using the external reference source. We were also able to run the APR-16 at 60 in/s, but takeup tension was a bit low.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://richardhess.com/notes/2006/03/06/sony-apr-speed-experiments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
