The Lunar Orbiter tape digitization folks have just posted a commentary that bears reading by all archivists who are holding tapes. You may link to it here. The main site is www.moonviews.com

NASA, in their press conference yesterday held at The Newseum, admitted that the original 14-track 1-inch instrumentation (IRIG) tapes that contained the slow-scan video direct from the moon were most likely recycled and reused for later missions. Apparently, over 350,000 reels of instrumentation tape were recycled by NASA over time. No one apparently thought to preserve the 45-odd reels of the original moon walk.

The loss of the original IRIG tapes of the moonwalk is truly sad because this data could be re-converted to standard television formats using far superior methods than were available in 1969. There may be 2-inch helical Ampex VR-660 video tapes still extant of the slow-scan data,  but those have not surfaced. It appears that all surviving copies of the moonwalk videos are ones that had gone through optical standards converters. An optical standards converter is one that has a monitor displaying the image in real time in the transmitted standard and a television camera taking a picture of that monitor using the desired standard. Even the Australian Broadcasting Corp. tapes would have gone through this type of device, although they would be in PAL rather than the U.S.’s NTSC versions.

Lowry Digital is doing a great job of restoring what they have, but the Polaroid screen shot that survives of the slow-scan monitor is alluring of what could have been preserved. More information is available on the Parkes website and from NASA.

Vigilant migration of data as new storage techniques become available is the only way to assure long-term preservation. Even if the IRIG tapes are found, we are almost at the point where the tapes would be un-decipherable. I think one of my machines could play them (I say think as I’ve never tested it to full 500 kHz bandwidth), but I don’t have the specialized video decoder. NASA apparently preserved some equipment should the tapes ever show up.

This also raises another spectre. We MUST be selective as to what we keep in our archives because if we keep everything we won’t be able to afford it–or find it. This is one of the key jobs that archivists do. However, blindly following retention practices, as was done by NASA for the IRIG Apollo 11 tapes, needs to be tempered by historians as well. Certain small subsets of data (moonwalk slow scan video) are much more important than others (astronauts’ blood pressure and other biometrics throughout the entire flight).

All organizations who keep archives need to address this. In a generation (or less) if we save everything, it will become an overwhelming burden and the high points will be lost if they are not properly indexed.

In the process of doing this work, I have learned a few things which might be of assistance. This is the first post in the blog in the live sound and recording category. Many of the posts relating to microphones will also be tagged in the oral history category.

One of the challenges for good sound reinforcement or speech recording is keeping the speaker “on mic”. There are many ways of handling this, but some work better than others. Here are my favourites:

• If the room is quiet and you can do a proper setup, a pair of Sennheiser MKH-416 short shotgun mics, one for the interviewer and one for the interviewee, gives very natural and unselfconscious results.
• For larger groups, I’ve had good results with an Audio Technica AT-822 (or the phantom-powered AT-825) stereo microphone, but the actual voice quality of that mic is inferior to the MKH-416. The high-end is harsher, but, used at a greater distance that is often not as noticeable. The room needs to be very quiet for this to work well, however. This is currently my least favourite approach (of those listed).
• So far, some of the best pickup I have found is a headworn mic–the main subject of this post.

At our church, they had tried headworn mics from Shure and they really were uncomfortable. Whoever selected the units, selected dynamic units and they did not sound all that good. They were retired in favour of the Countryman E6 units (also available from Shure, although I prefer the direct-from-Countryman version with the 2mm cable for robustness).

The Countryman units were working reasonably well, but never seemed to stay in the same place. It was frustrating as it was causing a widely varying sound quality, so we decided to try a DPA 4066 headworn mic on our head priest. The results were outstanding. The unit is comfortable (no more sore ears), it stays put, and it sounds better!

It is no surprise that these are taking over the religious and theatre markets. I am not sure I’d want to try to fit one of these on 87-year-old Aunt Tilly who is trying to tell us some family histories as it may make her self conscious, but probably no more so than a large microphone stuck close to her face. That’s where the short shotgun Sennheiser MKH 416s come in handy, they get the same sound pulled farther back–as long as Aunt Tilly talks in that direction.

As mentioned in a recent post about Story Corps, it appears they are using the Neumann KMS-105 in their mobile recording units. These are reputedly also excellent microphones and would be worthy of consideration when a more conventional, close-talking microphone is required.

A clip-on lavaliere microphone (such as the DPA 4060 miniature microphone, essentially the same capsule as on the 4066 headworn microphone) is useful, but the positioning is critical and often the sound is not as good as one would hope due to body resonances and clothing absorption and rustling.